Monday, February 27, 2012
Who are the benefactors of the IR casinos in S'pore?
Did our economy fare badly then when we did not have casinos on our land? What are the repercussions and societal upheaval that has upset many a life of S'pore families..Problem gambling is so rampant.
Authorities always see the optimistic side of the coin, carpeting the dark side of misery of problem gamblers and their families. Couselling can do that much only. the damage had been done!
NCPG can only do that much. National Council of Problem Gambling (NCPG) only comes in when someone is deep in the shit. And by them, the family members and children would have been affected. It is a regression in society when we have too many problem gamblers.
The govt pushed ahead even when Lim Boon Heng- the lone ranger - cried for mercy not to approve the building of the casinos. .Few years down the road...It is the operators and the govt..that are laughing to the bank!
The worst affected are the poor and according to a finding , The poor gamble more than the average rich!..the poor can gamble $1000 of their $2000 salary or in many case finished all and be in bad debts..Hence 'legal' and illegal moneylenders are doing a soaring business without care of a damn of what society has become!
Our govt must bear the greater responsibility on the social decadence of gambling on a large scale. NCPG is just an ineffective 'good to see and hear organisation only...
As long as there are gambling in a community, no want is the wiser and more are to lose! Only as I say aain, the operators and the govt stand to gain millions or billions of the sweat money of the poor.
As though Toto, 4-D and horse racing is not enough. Casino is the ultimate death of many who cannot resist gambling..How many can , may I ask ??
patrick lee song juan (leesjuanpat)
Saturday, February 25, 2012
The Aftermath of the three Sues !
The local political storm subsided somewhat on the YSL farce. And a mini-tsunami stirred the PAP camp just less than a week ago with Foreign ministar Shan-mutu starting the ball rolling and PM Lee and brother followed in the sue-ing process.
Yawning Bread (Alex Au) cannot even yawn to see ! TRE quickly threw in the towel.
(Richard Wan just said don't wan....t !)
The 'Rock of Gibraltar' is a strong as ever, any more eggs to crack on it??....S'pore can only sue others (and sure if you are in the "wrong!"..hahaaa!)
A political writer's (me) analysis of the fracas. In the eyes of the citizens, many would have the swift conclusion of the ruling system arm-locked the weaker party.. Whosoever is right or wrong...in the eyes of S'poreans, is still the system not only arm-lock the supposed perpetrator but want shut off their oxygen!
Is this a democracy of freedom of expression and human rights ?? It is to the Power of Control to interpret ! Power is King everywhere on earth...not only in S'pore!!
Hence the political sourness of relationship is brewing emotionally strong again. And it would be a consequence of VOTES in the 2016 GE... Never hurt human emotions!!
PAP should know how and why they lost Aljunied GRC....A gentle friendly reminder please!!
Har! am I taking sides !!???
patrick lee song juan
Monday, February 20, 2012
Why are people sued for defamation!
Why are people sued for defamation!
Today, Temasek Review Emeritus (TRE) got sued by PM LHL for a unfounded write on his wife Ho Ching, incidentally is the CEO of Temasek Holdings..not Temasek Review, haha! And by the news I heard at 5 pm today, TRE had issued a statement that they would withdraw the offending article and comply by PM's lawyers demand of taking out the article and posting an apology on TRE to equal to the time and day..-TRE had posted that article...Fair demand!
Singapore is an open society...many things are open..but many things too are not so open for scrutiny..We need to be more cautious in what we wrote or what we alleged (must have solid proof for any such allegation)...So, S'pore practises our own form of fair justice as deem by our government..and who can default them, when we have no basis to retaliate. Remember, we are a democracy, but we are not Uncle Sam's America. We have not reached there yet..And we will never attain that height. If we do, S'pore may or may not be that peaceful. We need to understand the governing of the government!
Whoever is in power, the power lies in their discretion of judgment. So, let us not go beyond the benchmark of discernment! As we recall those years of happy sue-ing by PAP against opposition during campaigning and after the elections. Those years was a real scarce for the oppositions. J BJ, Tan Liang Hong, Francis Seow and Chee Soon Juan all tasted the brunt of lawsuit on the happy trigger of PAP...and the worst would be those political detainees of ISA..It is that power is the justice!
We do hope that that era of fear is over..And we sincerely hope as responsible citizens , we can disseminate news accurately and without bias!
We will be on the road to civilization in the internet age!
Why this by-election in Hougang is another test for PAP's failure!
Why this by-election in Hougang, is another test for PAP's failure !
.
Is it within the control of WP when YSL went astray with his philandering ? WP has no control of his private life. If for that matter YSL voted in by the residents, neglected his duty as a MP to his ward then WP is at fault to pick such an MP...As simple as that!.
What KBW need to say ...would be..."It is unfortunate that after such a short 8 months WP is saddled with YSL's revelation of sexual deceit. Human failure is everywhere. I, KBW empathise with WP for that unfortunate happening. We move on and PAP will strongly challenge WP to capture back Hougang when by-election is held."..General statement of understanding..How magnanimous, right! But no KBW must uttered that WP had misled the voters of Hougang..In what way has WP misled the voters?..Just because of YSL misdeed? Can WP control his personal lust of wrongdoing?-What had been done or what had said, will bear a repercussion on each party.
WP had done its best of damaged control by asking Yaw (YSL) to account for his wrongdoing. Yet YSL was too adamant and maintained his silence. And in so doing WP's CEC had no choice but to give a fair internal deliberation and Yaw was voted out..literally dismissed! This showed how WP can be accountable and transparent to the people and residents of Hougang.
And by such action WP is one to be emulated as setting a precedent to any other parties that accountability and transparency is the way to go, if MPs or even ministers erred in their duties..and moral undertakings.
In fact PAP was really caught unaware that WP's LTK would deliver that salvo in the strictest of discipline to his protege! And he did with a heavy heart for sure..but it must be done, in view of YSL's overtly silence, which is not an option!
With this episode causing a mini-tsunami of sort..it paves the way for a by-election for Hougang.
And PAP is in two minds...To hold or not to hold!...PAP has little choice! so out pop that lost young loser in Hougang coming out again from nowhere to tell the press if Hougang needs him , he will hold MPS for the residents...Has not Desmond Choo (DL) abandoned those who had voted for him...this I would say is a 'real misled' by DL whom residents voted him as the loser then.
A real opportunist coming out of the blue to claim his unofficial tuft as though he has ownership of it...LOL!
The BY-election must be held and PAP knows too well, it will be another anti-climax, not of YSL philandering but of PAP losing Hougang again to WP...And it would be the reinforcement of how the people of Hougang know what is good and right for them...YSL's debacle would not ruffle a feather!
People are not daff to know what is a sincerity of action on WP's party on transparency and accountability...Desmond Choo will be 'hamtam' into a 'chapati'...predictably a second time loser if PAP will to field him....Though Eric Low held the dubious record as the rhino-skin man...insensitive to his losing and losing, until he threw in the towel..LOL!
Hougang after the by-election would still be WP's baby love! ...Bye bye love PAP, Hougang is not yours to take on in 'lust!'..hahaaaha!
Sunday, February 12, 2012
the Ramification of Workers Party !
What ramification is Workers Party (WP) facing ?
Enter the dragon after May 2011, before even the dragon ushered into the Lunar New Year of 2012, when WP slayed two full-fetched ministers of PAP into oblivion in Aljunied GRC. The road to stardom is a primrose path..Everyone sees it with hope that after 52 years..a salvation is within reach. We had enough of PAP's arrogance and insensitivity!
Eight or so months passed with euphoria of joy and political transformation in bits and pieces by the PAP camp. All knew it came about with WP winning a GRC and retaining Hougang..And a young apromising politician trained by Low Thia Khiang (LTK) emerged the confident successor for Hougang SMC..We all did not even bother the mistakes of CST. And many predicted, SPP will be history.And it did!
The joy and jubilation was short-lived to only roughly eight months. And the ramifications of a party member falling out of grace, is all too shocking for all who voted for that man. How can we discount the fact of the matter?...Is it true or untrue?..Why the complete silence? Why the resignation as from CEC? Too many whys, but too little answers, or no answer at all!
And when Tan Kin Lian, the president un-hopeful wrote to the Forum of ST, to suggest that WP stand of no comments was the right thing to do, it was a faux pas, to say the least. And the mystery deepened without even a statement from WP's SG LTK.
Life goes on in the surface , maybe hiding behind a facade of nonchalance! How far and wide the ramifications of a WP MPs episode which was nationalised in the News and online media, only WP will fathom. But in keeping quiet , as though the MP is not answerable to the voters who voted him in, at best is short-changed, and at worst, it is a long-shot! It is not, nothing to do with one's private life and public image. It has a hell of enormous doing, because it encompasses the moral issue of a MP and can a morally weak MP be a good adviser to its electorate ?
.
Each of us would have varied answers and opinions. But at the end of a day, if I am a counsellor, can I counsel others when I cannot even counsel myself properly???It may or may not be the straw that broke the camel's back, in the days and years to come to 2016. Can there be a 'Saving of Ryan', like in the movie? Can WP re-invent itself better after this yet proven nor wanting to see the true light of that 'happening' conundrum!
.
As long as it is not made clear and the cards are not laid on the table..doubts will be there..And doubts will form unwholesome ideas. Opposition as it is now, for a greater breakthrough of PAP's stranglehold, cannot afford to let voters have unwholesome ideas about things.
It can be a straight road or a crooked back alley! We maybe wiser, but are we??
Tuesday, February 7, 2012
Interview with Dr Kieran James of the University of Queensland.
Exclusive Interview: Patrick Lee Song Juan talks about battle for Pasir Ris-Punggol
Kieran James: Hi Patrick. First of all can you tell me how it came about that you contested with the Singapore Democratic Alliance (SDA) team in Pasir Ris-Punggol GRC at the May 2011 General Election?
KJ: I recall that at one stage you planned to be part of an independent team.
PLSJ: I felt as an independent the resources would be logistically tough. He [DL] took me as his mentor. I advised him on a couple of things. I was not even on the [Pasir Ris-Punggol GRC] team yet. I was invited to sit on their CEC meeting [Singapore People’s Party, SPP, the lead party of SDA at that time]. This was the year before the election. He brought up his plans to contest in single seat versus Teo Ser Luck. We thought they wanted to divide [Pasir Ris-]Punggol GRC into Punggol West [and remainder]. I said to him “you are a veteran in 06, why do you want to go to a single seat? We are novices”. He did not agree with me. A Malay guy working in Dubai came back for the meeting. I was not happy. I told him I will not have anything to do with it. His strategy is very poor.
On the first outreach I wrote an article. He wanted to put me as Mass Communication Manager. I said: “don’t put a title on me”. Goh Meng Seng [GMS] said: “you are in SDA now?” He [DL] should listen to what I tell him. I was behind the scenes in politics for many years. I left him as did the Malay guy. We never thought SDA would put a team in Punggol GRC. The Malay friend was a candidate from Jalan Besar GRC before and contested in it in 2006..He does not want his name to be published...Now [he is] still in Dubai working!
KJ: Why was that?
PLSJ: There were not enough people to contest. I felt sad for him [DL]. You can see what happened. He lost his deposit. Even so if not a three corner fight [in Punggol East SMC] he will still lose his deposit but not by so much. He cried during the election campaign. He claimed Workers’ Party supporters [were] harassing him.
I like also the new [PAP] guy, DBS banker [Mr Gan Thian Poh]. He shook my hand, very courteous. One of the other PAP interrupted our talk. The crony was sarcastic. I said: “A lot of you guys talk bird language, talk cock”. I said: “What’s the point, at the end of the day you are just cronies”. He wanted to argue with me. I forgot his name, grassroots guy, not on the team. They know my credibility. Gan showed me respect by telling the grassroots guy to be quiet. I departed cordially from Gan after asking about his family. I catapulted to a bit of prominence during the election but all the time I’m a behind the scenes guy.
PLSJ: I think the Workers’ Party are very shrewd, they know what they are doing; they understand the politics of Singapore much more than SDP, that is why PAP is more in tune with them than with SDP,... SDP is rather confrontational.
PLSJ: I wrote an article [saying] Singapore cannot have a one-party system. I hope one-third will be opposition and then there will be a constitutional right to speak on any topic. The people are more politically aware [now] and their mentality has changed. It can certainly happen [i.e. one-third opposition MPs in 10-15 years]. Workers’ Party can definitely win some more seats and officially become leader of the opposition then.
KJ: What has been one of your more important public speaking engagements?
KJ: On another matter what do you think are the reasons behind Mah Bow Tan’s exit?
PLSJ: MBT was unpopular due to the housing board issues. People never accepted what he said about HDB being affordable. Lee Hsien Loong got the cue and removed him.
KJ: And NSP’s showing in Tampines was another factor?
PLSJ: [Yes] NSP’s success in Tampines was another reason. If you put Hazel Poa in there NSP could have gone higher. They [NSP] were quite disappointed. I’m not with them. I needed to help SDA to see Teo Chee Hean not do a walk-over...Citizens will be disappointed that no voice represented them..Hence we are happy we put on a good fight and scored 35.2% of the votes.
KJ: Why did you agree to rejoin the SDA team in Pasir Ris-Punggol GRC right at the last minute after having previously withdrawn?
PLSJ: I’m a voice for the poor, I go for the deprived, those who are marginalized. If I don’t stand in Pasir Ris it will be a walkover for PAP. Me and Sidney Soon came in two days prior, 35% was fantastic. Teo Chee Hean was DPM, he lost face, [and] we scampered in. KJ is unpopular, we beat him and his team by 3% point. We should have just got 18%, [and] Kenneth is finished...[KJ: PLSJ here is not talking about me of course but about Kenneth Jeya of RP].
KJ: Can Desmond Lim bounce back?
An Eulogy poem to Dr Toh Chin Chye.
Saturday, February 4, 2012
The manipulation of the Human Mind- the truth and fallacy!
The manipulation of the Human mind...the truth and the fallacy!
I studied the bible and scripture in my missionary school years and and had a distinction in my O level Bible Knowledge...But I embrace Buddhism for the practicality of the true daily living of moderation and middle path..
i am a meditation practitioner for many years with retreat hermitage meditation away from home...And that is why my assimilation of know-how is never too judgmental but disseminating!l
All religions are good ...it is the evil of people that distorted and made it bad...in greed, in power, in desire, in lust, in every idiosyncrasies of human that can think of; to take advantage of another fellow human!....How sad, the fallacy of and manipulation of human...
Beast fare better! Beast have no god but they live by their conduct of 'survival for the fittest' in the true sense of the natural world...not of "mind disease" of mankind!
To each his/her own...the power of indoctrination and conditioned belief to the point of instilling fear and all kind of testimony to the congregation..
Never forget..many who attended church, temple .or mosque.for that matter, are simple kind minded people..And with power talk and influenced of the strong mind on the weak...anything can happen.. A form of psychological indoctrination !
Human mind is the most complex of living organ to transform the world of goodness or evil..lives or death.. Can we not see that happening in everyday life since the beginning of time??..The power of mind manipulates and manifest its strongest influence on the simple weak mind..
Only a strong meditating mind of awareness would stem off whatever disillusionary utterance of the powerful god...It is the men that are god not god itself!!..
god is our spiritual and emotional conviction of following a good and compassion lifestyle in relations to the evil world of human.....
patrick lee song juan
Transcript of my interview with Dr Kieran James on GE 2011
Transcript of my interview with Senior Lecturer Dr Kieran James of University of Southern Queensland on our GE 2011
My exclusive interview with Mr Patrick Lee Song Juan (Singapore Democratic Alliance contestant for Pasir Ris-Punggol GRC, 2011 GE)
“I’m very happy with the 35.2%, we are all greenhorns, first-timers in politics. I met many residents who said: ‘you dare fight with Teo Chee Hean?’ I said purposefully: ‘Who is Teo Chee Hean?’” - Patrick Lee Song Juan
“For James Gomez and Goh Meng Seng if they had stayed with Workers’ Party they would have been MPs already” - Patrick Lee Song Juan
By Dr Kieran James (University of Southern Queensland),
Interview at: Tiong Bahru Plaza, Singapore, 6 October 2011
Kieran James (KJ) : Hi Patrick. First of all can you tell me how it came about that you contested with the Singapore Democratic Alliance (SDA) team in Pasir Ris-Punggol GRC at the May 2011 General Election?
Patrick Lee Song Juan (PLSJ) : To put it from the beginning, Desmond [Lim] [current Secretary-General of SDA] head-hunted me on FaceBook, he befriended me [and] read my writings. I found he’s a nice guy; he doesn’t have an evil motive.
KJ: I recall that at one stage you planned to be part of an independent team...
PLSJ: I felt as an independent the resources would be logistically tough. He [DL] took me as his mentor. I advised him on a couple of things. I was not even on the [Pasir Ris-Punggol GRC] team yet. I was invited to sit on their CEC meeting [Singapore
People’s Party, SPP, the lead party of SDA at that time]. This was the year before the election. He brought up his plans to contest in single seat versus Teo Ser Luck. We thought they wanted to divide [Pasir Ris-]Punggol GRC into Punggol West [and remainder]. I said to him “you are a veteran in 06, why do you want to go to a single seat? We are novices”. He did not agree with me. A Malay guy working in Dubai came back for the meeting. I was not happy. I told him I will not have anything to do with it. His strategy is very poor.
On the first outreach I wrote an article. He wanted to put me as Mass Communication Manager. I said: “don’t put a title on me”. Goh Meng Seng [GMS] said: “you are in SDA now?” He [DL] should listen to what I tell him. I was behind the scenes in politics for many years. I left him as did the Malay guy. We never thought SDA would put a team in Punggol GRC. The Malay friend was a candidate from Jalan Besar GRC before and contested in it in 2006..He did not want his name to be published...Now still in Dubai working!
KJ: Why was that?
PLSJ: There were not enough people to contest. I felt sad for him [DL]. You can see what happened. He lost his deposit. Even so if not a three corner fight [in Punggol East SMC] he will still lose his deposit but not by so much. He cried during the election campaign. He claimed Workers’ Party supporters [were] harassing him.
KJ: So how did you come back into the team for Pasir Ris-Punggol just before the election?
PLSJ: I came in two days before Nomination. My photo was taken. [KJ: Patrick Lee’s very late re-entry to the team is why Wikipedia did not list him as a candidate even after the poll.] I talked to Desmond before this. I talked to Sidney Soon. I said “one day Chiam See Tong will play him out” and, sure enough [it happened]. I told him to leave SPP early, six months ago before the GE!.
KJ: What state was SJP [Singapore Justice Party] in prior to Desmond taking over there?
PLSJ: SJP was just a shell party with a few core people [such as] founding President [and] Treasurer. He said: “I think Chiam See Tong will play me out”. Chiam See Tong withdrew his SPP from SDA. Desmond had no choice but to fall back on SJP. Six months out I told him to pull out of SPP. I predicted it. It’s very sad. SDA was only PKMS, SJP, and SPP. I declined to be on CEC of SJP because he refused to listen. PKMS supported him a lot. He thought he was very safe.
When CST withdrew from SDA, SDA was and is even now a total empty shell. I told GMS when we had a telephone conversation that CST is not a gentleman to Desmond. GMS said “he’s a lawyer, he will sue you”. I gave it to my lawyer friend to vet; it was all factual statements of what CST said. Desmond was left dangling. No-one was there to form our team. He wanted to recruit some Masters guy; Silhita Nilesh was to stand but he later declined saying his US Company did not give him permission to stand. Desmond fell back on me.
Desmond barred me from speaking. When Teo Chee Hean asked me (in the toilet) “why don’t you join us?” I said “you go after the PhD, Masters, Mistresses, and Bachelors!” I graduated from the University of Lifelong Learning.
George Yeo lost big time, he’s an idiot, [and] he always thinks he’s intelligent. “Aljunied voters will have "emotional dilemma” says George Yeo. I said: “It’s George Yeo’s own emotional dilemma”.
KJ: So what are your opinions of the campaigning performance of your SDA team in Pasir Ris-Punggol?
PLSJ: Desmond made very major mistakes, every speech took one hour; his speeches are not entertaining. He banned me from the press and speaking at rallies.
KJ: How many rallies did you actually speak at then?
PLSJ: Officially I spoke at one rally and I was last-minute replacement for the second rally. I spoke for twelve minutes; that was my best rally speech and I spoke off-the cuff with no preparation..because was not slated to speak..Only for party sake I stood in for Tony tan (same name as president)..when he got stage fright..And he never spoke in any rally at all!
KJ: What were the crowds at the rallies?
PLSJ: At the second rally crowd of 7000-8000 in Punggol-Pasir Park. At the first rally [there was] only 1,000 at Senkang because it was raining. At third rally he excluded my name. He did not want me to speak. We only had three rallies. He put his wife up and she cried onstage. I was at home, I didn’t attend, [and] she said “people harass my husband”.
Teo Chee Hean asked me why he doesn’t see me with them [other SDA]? Only after election I put on FaceBook saying “this will be my first and last election”. I resigned from SDA through FaceBook. He did not give me an official reply. Jeffrey Lim resigned as did Tony Tan.
KJ: OK, key question: Are you happy with the 35.2% result achieved by your SDA team?
PLSJ: I’m very happy with the 35.2%, we are all greenhorns, first-timers in politics. I met many residents who said: “you dare fight with Teo Chee Hean?” I said purposefully: “Who is Teo Chee Hean?” Then I say: “I’m joking with you”. I say: “Does he have four arms? He is an ordinary person made good, we fight on equal terms”. These people are so intimidated by ministers [but] we are all equal except for different circumstances when they (ministers) are catapulted to high positions.
KJ: Can you remember any interesting or funny incidents from the campaign?
PLSJ: One incident is I met this Penny Low, she has got the worst brickbats from the residents, [and] many promises are not kept. I met her at Pasir Ris MRT campaign. She was still on crutches recovering from leg operation. I said: “Are you OK Penny?" I was sarcastic, you are limping, [and] it’s a very small thing. She told me the truth: “I had operation”. I said: “Take care, goodbye” and [then] she was upset. I have the guts and humour to do it.
Teo Ser Luck is a nice baby-face guy. He was shouting all the names of his gang at the rally. I said: “This is not the way”. He said laughing: “I’m not a politician”. He is a nice guy, he does not show pretense. I like also the new [PAP] guy, DBS banker [Mr Gan Thian Poh]. He shook my hand, very courteous. One of the other PAP interrupted our talk. The crony was sarcastic. I said: “A lot of you guys talk bird language, talk cock”. I said: “What’s the point, at the end of the day you are just cronies”. He wanted to argue with me. I forgot his name, grassroots guy, not on the team. They know my credibility. Gan showed me respect by telling the grassroots guy to be quiet. I departed cordially from Gan after asking about his family. I catapulted to a bit of prominence during the election but all the time I’m a behind the scenes guy.
KJ: What were the reasons behind your friend Goh Meng Seng’s resignation from the NSP [National Solidarity Party] Secretary-General’s post after the election?
PLSJ: GMS was pressured to resign. It [NSP electoral results] is seen as a failure. GMS is a very nice guy, very accommodating. He took all the RP [Reform Party] group in as a mass exodus. Gilbert Goh asked me which party to join. I said: “KJ [Kenneth Jeyaretnam] is not a good leader [and] I don’t think Workers’ Party will accept you. I said: “NSP is a good choice”. Out of the blue he joined RP but when the exodus happened a few days later he quit rightaway!
KJ: What do you think of the NSP’s election campaign strategy?
The NSP strategy was not really that good. He [GMS] should have put himself, Hazel [Poa], [and] Tony Tan in Tampines [GRC]. GMS approved me joining the NSP and I would have been a member in Tampines.
KJ: Ah, really? That’s new information to me. When was this?
PLSJ: Before the election. SDA had problems getting people and Desmond and Sidney Soon asked me to join them again. I said to GMS: “I’m sorry; I have to leave the party”. I do it for the best interests of the people. GMS wanted to put me into Tampines to contest Mah Bow Tan, I dislike Mah Bow Tan. and his handlin gof the HDB escalating price.I left to join SDA with GMS blessing..(Ken Sun was not happy about that!) GMS asked Gilbert Goh to take over in Tampines. I told Steve Chia I was interested to join NSP, straight away my membership was approved. I was only in NSP for one week, they approved my membership already, [and] they all know me already. Ken Sun said: “You played us out”. I said: “What about all those who played out the RP?” I wrote in the blog that the old birds of NSP should give way to the young. Sitting too long in the CEC of NSP..the main old veterans !
KJ: What did you think of the NSP’s result at the election including Steve Chia?
PLSJ: I was surprised Steve Chia did not do well; I thought it might be due to the personal incident, PAP capitalized on this. The opposition did not have their presence felt at all. They should have functions better at walkabouts. Tony Tan can’t speak very well. He’s a scholar but his rally speech was quite mediocre..lack punch!
KJ: Tell me about your role in the presidential election of August this year as well as your thoughts on the election.
PLSJ: I was helping Tan Jee Say. I will give you a perspective. George Yeo announced he first did not want to be presidential candidate but later said he wanted to be. He was asked to step down. I knew Tony Tan would win. I lobbied for Tan Cheng Bok, he has a presence in west coast, he is a respected doctor. I arranged a meeting with Tan Jee Say with the Hainanese Association through a Hainanese friend who came back from Sydney (He quitted S'pore to live in Australia). Twenty people attended at a coffee shop at Liang Seah street ..our Hainanese enclave ! Later on we went to the Kheng Chiu Association [premises].
KJ: Returning to something we touched on previously do you think Mr Goh Meng Seng will return to active politics?
PLSJ: I think GMS will contest in next election. He just needs a break.
KJ: What did you think of performance of SDP [Singapore Democratic Party] in the May election?
PLSJ: SDP performance is not that good too - honestly it’s quite pathetic. They will not be able to redeem themselves if they do not change their political ideology in Singapore, they are too belligerent. In Singapore you cannot be too belligerent, you cannot connect in [the[] American way – democracy, freedom, human rights, ISA. They [the Establishment] don’t harm you if you don’t do anything wrong. Why bother with ISA?
KJ: What is your opinion on James Gomez’ move to SDP earlier this year?
PLSJ: Gomez is on the way down. He is an intelligent guy. He does not have a mindset to stay in one place. For him and Meng Seng if he stayed with Workers’ Party he would have been an MP already. I said to GMS: “Why do you need the [SG] title?”
KJ: Earlier we were talking about the presidential election result? I think I interrupted you and we got distracted...
PLSJ: The result is already foregone, once Tony Tan comes in. The reason why he did not win so well is Tan Cheng Bok. TCB scored 70% in west coast. [KJ: I’m not sure here whether Patrick meant West Coast GRC or the whole west coast area.] The vote was split due to Tan Jee Say. Otherwise I think TCB could have won. Tony Tan has the experience but he cannot speak Mandarin unlike TCB; how can he speak to Hu Jintao? He lost $60 billion with the GLC. How can he say he is an expert in economics?
KJ: Why do you think Workers’ Party chose to ignore the presidential election?
PLSJ: I think the Workers’ Party are very shrewd, they know what they are doing; they understand the politics of Singapore much more than SDP, that is why PAP is more in tune with them than with SDP,... SDP is rather confrontational.
KJ: Can I ask you for your revised view on the third question in my original research project: “What do you think will happen in Singapore politics in next 10-15 years?”
PLSJ: I wrote an article [saying] Singapore cannot have a one-party system. I hope one-third will be opposition and then there will be a constitutional right to speak on any topic. The people are more politically aware [now] and their mentality has changed. It can certainly happen [i.e. one-third opposition MPs in 10-15 years]. Workers’ Party can definitely win some more seats and officially become leader of the opposition then.
KJ: What has been one of your more important public speaking engagements?
PLSJ: My speech Mothers’ Day on filial piety at YWCA, 9 May 2010 arranged by Active Retirees Association. Two hundred people attended. I spoke freely as a volunteer. My volunteer Emcee for Marine Parade CC's Inter-generational harmony at East Coast Park with then SM Goh Chok Tong and the other ministers as guest of honour.
KJ: On another matter what do you think are the reasons behind Mah Bow Tan’s exit?
PLSJ: MBT was unpopular due to the housing board issues. People never accepted what he said about HDB being affordable. Lee Hsien Loong got the cue and removed him.
KJ: And NSP’s showing in Tampines was another factor?
PLSJ: [Yes] NSP’s success in Tampines was another reason. If you put Hazel Poa in there NSP could have gone higher. They [NSP] were quite disappointed. I’m not with them. I need to help SDA to see Teo Chee Hean not do a walk-over...Citizens will be disappointed that no voice represented them..Hence we are happy we put on a good fight and scored 35.2% of the votes..
KJ: Why did you agree to rejoin the SDA team in Pasir Ris-Punggol GRC right at the last minute after having previously withdrawn?
PLSJ: I’m a voice for the poor, I go for the deprived, those who are marginalized. If I don’t stand in Pasir Ris it will be a walkover for PAP. Me and Sidney Soon came in two days prior, 35% was fantastic. Teo Chee Hean was DPM, he lost face, [and] we scampered in. KJ is unpopular, we beat him and his team by 3% point. We should have just got 18%, [and] Kenneth is finished.... [KJ: PLSJ here is not talking about me of course but about Kenneth Jeya of RP].
KJ: Can Desmond Lim bounce back?
PLSJ: His performance was terrible, 1,386 plus votes, he should not have nominated if he knew Workers’ Party would contest.
[Our two-hour interview ended here.]
NB...
This is copyright property of Dr Kieran James...No part of it should be produced without written permission of Dr Kieran James.
patrick lee song juan
Thursday, February 2, 2012
Chiam See Tong and his legacy lost!
Chiam See Tong (CST) and his legacy lost!
All these years of his SPP rule and as an MP...that was his only good showing!! Along the way...many tiffs with his party people , notably with Desmond Lim. And his pinhole vision about succession when he put his wife Lina as his successor. That show the quality of his leadership..without the wisdom of picking the right successor. Desmond or for that matter Wilfred Leung would have been the right choice then! But on hindsight, Benjamin Pwee is better...Chinese saying: Back tide rushes off the front tide" -(sounds so crude...but this is a very refined Chinese prose and idiom, if spoken in mandarin! My PC not mandarin text friendly to add in !)
And during GE 2011..he as leader made a poor tactical choice of coming out of his fortress in Potong Pasir and let his wife run..And all would have know what happened!!
And his lofty ambition to win Toa Payoh Bishan GRC made him looked so minisicle against Wong Kan Seng..(the Mas Selamat man). CST was so frail and weak, he would have long retired into the background to act as adviser to the younger members and new scholar recruit in Benjamin Pwee (BP). In fact without BP, he looked totally famished by WKS!
Whatever he tries to defend himself now..by the very fact that six young and able CEC members en-bloc exodus is testimony of his leadership and succession to the doom..Lina according, in one of a comment on my FB wall, someone said she is a wet nurse..It speaks volumes of her ability even as an NCMP..what more as Vice-chairman of SPP...
You are what you are..beyond that in stage act..people would come to terms with your acting skill. Like in parliament ..the different between a speech by Chen Show Mao and Lee Bee Wah..the vast chasm in between the delivery and finesse. It is the quality of a politician and an MP...That is the difference, cannot be the denying facts !!
I respect Chiam for what he did for opposition politics. Beyond that I do not see a strong leader in him all those years of selfish ego and power of control, no different from LKY in PAP, but it would be definitely worse if SPP were PAP for 52 years..At least PAP delivers...SPP retards and self-destructed his own succession and the party he created !!
A legacy lost in CSTand his SPP..I am sorry to say that! Regards...
SAGE - S'pore Action Group for the Elders.
SAGE - S'pore Action Group for the Elders is regressing with their culture of practice!
Me and my nephew in the picture!